Sunday, February 18, 2018

Ways we can address gun violence without waiting on Congress

There are certain things, we have no choice to accept. The adage is that there are only
two guarantees in life -- death and taxes.


Unnecessary occurrences of the former, however, are disturbing. The latest reminder
came on Wednesday when a suspect in a deadly rampage at a Florida high school, who
has been described as a troubled teenager who posted disturbing material on social media
before going on a shooting spree that killed 17 people and wounded more than a dozen
others, according to law enforcement officials and former schoolmates.


I was on my lunch break from work at one of my favorite eateries, Dad’s BBQ in
Pittsburg, CA, when I heard the news. The Mississippi style BBQ restaurant has a TV in
its establishment. Their food is off the hook but I’m surprised I didn’t lose my appetite when
I saw ABC News interrupt regular programming with breaking news.


Without overly revisiting the carnage, events like this have become too frequent. Honestly,
one is too many. There isn’t one uniform way of tracking school shootings in the United
States. Methodologies and definitions vary with each group collecting data, offering a
range of numbers on the prevalence of school shootings in recent years.


By one broad metric, there have been nearly 300 school shootings in America since 2013,
according to Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, which is an advocacy group that
seeks to prevent gun violence. The group defines a school shooting as any time a firearm
discharges a live round inside a school building or on a school grounds. Its database
includes incidents when no one was injured; attempted or completed suicide, with no
intent to injure others; and cases when a gun was fired unintentionally, resulting in injury
or death.
As a father of three (one in fifth grade and two in third grade), I would never get over it
if any of my kids were killed. Heck, even if they survived a dastardly crime like this, I
would not be the same.
Each tragedy brings out many passionate discussions about guns. I don’t own a gun, but I
have read and heard various opinions about guns, pro or anti. Some I agree with, others I
do not, and others are just boiler-plate statements or sophomoric memes for social media.
Feeds on social media become packed with politics in times like this. People screaming,
calling names, and posting hate towards each other. Heaven forbid we actually sit down
and find a solution.
Instead, people demonize or defend the NRA. I’m not an NRA member but they are not
the problem. Gun enthusiasts bellow how guns don’t just fall off shelves. Well, that is not
the answer we should be seeking either.
No gun law would have prevented the mass shooting in Florida or any other recent one.
So what is the answer? Guns won’t be banned in this country. Let’s get that established
now. Criminals are not going to walk into the police station and turn their weapons over
to the authorities. All of the finger pointing and “thoughts and prayers” solve nothing.
There are a segment of gun owners who suggest arming teachers and/or having armed
guards on school campuses. I can go along with the latter but that solution is only a
Band-Aid in the long run.  
Hate can’t be legislated but there are solutions. This is not a politician problem, be it
Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, George Bush, etc. This is also not a gun
problem, nor a gun access problem. The finger ultimately points at ourselves as a society
and until we acknowledge such, the cycle will continue.  
We need a complete overhaul. We need consistency. We need a moral code that can
encompasses all beliefs. It can and must happen.
We need a consistent and one rule federal gun code that rules the entire country. One set
of laws for everyone. They need to be consistent, strongly enforced and strongly protected.
That answers the second amendment and yet provides a true set of strict guidelines.
So what is the answer? Is it gun control? You can have strict background checks and you
can reinstitute the Federal Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004, but to think you are
ever going to keep guns out of the hands of people is naïve. That horse left the barn a long
time ago.
I also think we need to re-evaluate our entertainment and video game culture. Guns may be
the vehicle for the tragedy, but the aforementioned industries have at least some culpability.
These mass murderers are young adults that immersed themselves in violent movies and
video games. Why has there been such an increase in mental illness and anger issues?
Violence becoming normalized in our society is a significant reason. I’m 45 years old and
the movies that are PG-13 now would have been rated R when I was a kid.
If you want to say, “Well, it’s the parents’ job to police what the kids are watching or what
video games kids are playing.” True, but if nothing good comes from such forms of
entertainment, why have them in the first place?
However, as long as the First Amendment exists, censorship is going to be an uphill battle.
Plus, given that you have more dual-working parents, policing what they watch becomes
harder.
This is a multi-layered problem that needs to be addressed at every level, but there are two
ways that we can address this without waiting for Congress to pass a law, as many suggest.
Scrap the idea of waiting for Congress, you’ll be waiting a long time.
First, educate your children on gun safety and implement it in schools. OK, I hear educators
screaming like hell right now but to make a long-term difference, there needs to be outside
the box ideas. What we are doing is not working. The definition of insanity is doing the
same thing and expecting different results. Have you ever heard of the Eagle Eddie
Program? The program teaches children in preschool through third grade four important
steps to take if they find a gun. These steps are presented by the program’s mascot, Eddie
Eagle, in an easy-to-remember format consisting of four simple rules. “If you see a gun: Stop!
Don’t touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.”
The following description of the program isn’t in my words, but comes from the National
Rifle Association website:
“The program started in 1988 and has reached more than 25 million children in all 50 states.
This program was developed through the combined efforts of such qualified professionals
as clinical psychologists, reading specialists, teachers, curriculum specialists, urban housing
safety officials, and law enforcement personnel.
“Anyone may teach the Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program, and NRA membership is not
required. The program may be readily incorporated into existing school curriculum, taught
in a one- to five-day format. Materials available through this program are: student
workbooks, seven-minute animated video (available on DVD), instructor guides, brochures,
and student reward stickers. Program materials are also available in Spanish.”
I remember taking driver’s education after my freshman year of high school and our
teacher (Randall McClure) emphasized, “A car is a weapon just like a gun.” He later added
that driving a car comes with a big responsibility, similarly to possessing a gun. I didn’t
understand it at the time, but it resonates to this day.
Therein lies where youngsters need to learn the importance of gun safety at a young age,
regardless of whether or not they go on to become gun owners. Why? Because you are
driving one weapon and shooting another. It’s easy to say it “all starts in the home.” True.
However, not every home has an adult equipped to teach them such. By no means am I
promoting gun ownership but they need to be dealt with as a fact of life, just like electrical
sockets and swimming pools.
Second, stop stigmatizing mental illness. Guns are inanimate objects and I believe most gun
owners are responsible people. Honestly, the last people I worry about with guns are hunters
or NRA members because they are well-versed in gun safety and are not the kind to walk
into Walmart and kill hundreds of people.
For all the time, money and research we spend on cancer, I think it’s high time we devote
the same energy toward finding a cure and/or research for mental illness. It’s been too long
that this disease has been stigmatized by society.
Now don’t get the wrong idea — I’m not asking that we suddenly stop cancer fundraisers.
What I’m asking, however, is that we start devoting the same attention to mental illness.
Whether it is raising money for research or simply looking at it as a legitimate illness, as
opposed to a dirty little secret, would be a start.
Will these two steps ever prevent tragedies? No, at least not on a case-by-case basis.
However, they are practical solutions that will make a difference in the long run as well as
preserve the Second Amendment.
Some realities, we have to deal with because of the Second Amendment and its freedoms
but we don’t have to live with 17 dead high school students, 59 dead concert goers, 50
people in a nightclub, 28 elementary school kids or 27 people in a church.

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Time Out with Madison Van Zandt -- 2015 Napa High graduate

Vince D’Adamo: What did you enjoy most about competing in athletics
throughout your life?


Madison Van Zandt: My favorite part of competing in sports were the relationships
it lead me to. With both coaches and teammates, I met some incredible and
inspiring people that have continued to impact my life. Darci Ward and Michelle
Lewis truly changed my life and being a part of their program is an experience that
I hold so dearly to my heart. They were able to foster relationships between people
who would have never been friends otherwise, creating a second family for all of us.
I continue to talk to them and am able to come to them for advice whenever needed.
They have done so much for me and my family. I will always love and thank them
for the impact they have had on me. I was also lucky enough to have incredible
coaches out of town. Tom Corriveau was my first AAU coach for a team in Santa
Rosa. He passed away in 2015 and it was absolutely devastating. The fun and
energy he brought to our team is something I think about constantly. Thank you
Tom for everything that you did for me and the countless other girls you coached.
Your spirit and love for the game was truly unique -- rest in peace. Last but not
least is Rod Hodges and the MRC Rebels AAU program in San Francisco. Playing
for them in high school was simply incredible. I met so many amazing young
women and crazy talented basketball players all while having fun and traveling
around the country doing what I loved.


D’Adamo: What have you been doing since graduating from high school?


Van Zandt: Since graduating from Napa High in 2015, I have been attending UC
Santa Cruz. I am in my third year and am pursuing a degree in Environmental
Studies with a concentration in Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems.
This spring quarter will be my final at UCSC. After that I will be studying abroad
during the fall in Italy and Spain, completing a Mediterranean Politics, Food, and
Culture program and will be finished with my undergraduate degree after that. I
also played basketball for UCSC my freshman year. Even though the program
was not the right fit for me personally, I am grateful for that experience because
it introduced me to my best friends here in Santa Cruz. We also got to compete
in the DIII NCAA tournament after winning our conference which was an
exhilarating experience.


D’Adamo: What was your favorite class at Napa High?


Van Zandt: My favorite class at Napa High had to be either Honors English
freshman year with Mr. Aaron or Man’s Search for Meaning my senior year with
Mrs. V. Both were incredible classes that I recommend to any student. They gave
me the opportunity to excel in education while embracing my creative side at the
same time -- something that can be challenging in the public school system.


D’Adamo: What was your favorite athletic moment at Napa High?


Van Zandt: My favorite athletic moment at Napa High was probably my first Big
Game on varsity my freshman year. Experiencing that as a freshman was such a
unique opportunity. The crowd was crazy and the game had such high energy and
was so much fun. I’ll never forgot blocking one of their best players who was a
senior and we won. If my memory is correct I think it was the first time we had
beat Vintage in Big Game for awhile. Definitely something I’ll never forget.


D’Adamo: How much do you feel you have grown personally since
graduating from high school and how much of that do you trace to
athletics?


Van Zandt: I think I have grown a lot since high school. I still have a lot of the same
interests and pretty much the same personality but my internal growth has been
tremendous. Sports have taught me not to be afraid to set high goals and has also
given me the skills needed to reach them. Focus, determination, and believing in
yourself are all things I learned from playing sports. Also, not feeling like I
constantly have to go at things alone is something I really took away from sports.
Even if I’m not on a team anymore I have my own personal “team” of friends and
family who I know are always there to support me when I need it.


D’Adamo: Within your family, who have been the most influential people?


Van Zandt: My parents are my biggest inspiration. They have worked so hard to
give me and my brothers everything that we have. I know it wasn’t easy. As I got
older I realized how much time and money they put into us being able to play
sports and be on traveling teams. Driving to San Francisco and Santa Rosa two
days a week just for practice for about six years must have been crazy for them
-- not to mention driving all over northern California on weekends. They sacrificed
their own lives and happiness many times to help us be successful and to make
sure we had every opportunity to pursue our dreams, on and off the courts.
Thank you so much mom and dad. I love you with all my heart.


D’Adamo: Name a historical figure, dead or alive, in or out of sports you
would most like to meet.
Van Zandt: I would love to meet Gloria Steinem. She a trailblazer in the
male-dominated field of journalism and has went on to be a champion of women’s
rights and intersectional feminism. She is such an inspiration to me. Seeing strong
female role models in politics and other fields is so important for young girls,
especially in the trying times we are currently facing. Because of women like her
I have no intention of letting gender barriers ever stop me from pursuing my goals.

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Time Out with Arran Andersen -- 1989 Vintage High graduate

Vince D’Adamo: What did you enjoy most about competing in athletics
throughout your life?


Arran Andersen: I love the process. Working to get better, seeing tangible results,
and then testing yourself in competition. Often times, the fruits of your labor are
rewarded in both victory and defeat. That’s why I believe sports are so valuable
for kids. The lessons I learned growing up have stuck with me my entire life:
Never quit. Practice makes perfect. Leave it all out there on the playing field

D’Adamo: What have you been doing since graduating from high school?


I’m a sportscaster for the CBS Affiliate in Raleigh, NC. This stop No. 9 on my
cross country journey. Along the way I’ve covered Super Bowls, NCAA
Tournaments, NBA and NHL playoffs, and too many other sporting events to
count. I’ve also interviewed some of the biggest names in sports. For a self
professed sports nut, it’s been a dream come true.


D’Adamo: What was your favorite class at Vintage High?


Andersen: I took a an Art History class my senior year called “Man’s Search for
Meaning,” taught by Mr. Payne. It was a requirement that turned into a revelation
and opened my eyes to Art. I was so inspired that I minored in Art History at UC
Davis.  


D’Adamo: What was your favorite athletic moment at Vintage High?


Andersen: I scored 38 points against Vanden my senior year at Vintage. That was
my career high. I also dunked for the first and only time. My only regret was losing
that basketball game. I can still remember the last play. We were down by one
point with seconds left and the pass to me inside was stolen. If we had to do it all
over again, I would have had Tony Prescott take the last shot.


D’Adamo: How much do you feel you have grown personally since
graduating from high school and how much of that do you trace to athletics?


Andersen: I think sports are a great metaphor for life. You learn about overcoming
obstacles and dealing with adversity along with the value of being part of a team.
You learn what it means to be a good teammate, leadership, unselfishness,
commitment and character. These are all life skills and traits that translate into the
business world, regardless of what path you choose.  

What I do today is actually an extension of the sports I grew up playing. Only now
I’m covering professional athletes and teams. I translate their experiences to our
viewers.

D’Adamo: Within your family, who have been the most influential people?

I owe everything to my parents. Without them I wouldn’t be where I am today.
They inspired me, by believing in me. That’s a powerful thing. I have some many
great memories of sports at VHS and my mom and dad were part of every one of
them. They even kept going to high school games after my brother and I graduated.
They might be bigger sports fans than I am.

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Overreaction to pro athlete contracts borders on comical

Sometimes a chain of events serve as a reminder of what casual sports fans do not
understand.


Professional athletes make absurd amounts of money but when I hear people complain
about such salaries my response is, “Would you turn down that money?” I either get a
defensive response or hear crickets.


Here in the Bay Area, quarterbacks Derek Carr (Oakland Raiders) and Jimmy Garoppolo
(San Francisco 49ers) each inked monster contracts within the last eight months. Last
June, Carr signed a five-year deal worth $125 million, $40 million full guarantee at signing
and injury guarantee of $70M at signing. That highest paid status lasted about 14 minutes.
Well, actually about 67 days with Detroit Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford inking a
five-year deal worth $135 million. Stafford's contract set records for largest signing bonus
($50 million), most money fully guaranteed at signing ($60.5 million) and three-year cash
flow ($87 million).


Thanks to Garoppolo resetting the market, Stafford is no longer the highest paid player in
the NFL. The 49ers inked Garoppolo to a five-year deal of $137.5 million deal on Thursday
with $74 million guaranteed. With Washington’s Kirk Cousins, Green Bay’s Aaron Rodgers,
Atlanta’s Matt Ryan, New Orleans’ Drew Brees and Pittsburgh’s Ben Roethlisberger facing
the prospect of new deals, Garoppolo’s status of highest paid might last 27 minutes. If you
are any of those quarterbacks, you’re not taking a dime less than $30 million a year.


The 49ers acquired Garoppolo on Oct. 30 from New England, where he spent his first three
NFL seasons as Tom Brady’s understudy. Garoppolo started two games for the Patriots in
2016 and five for the 49ers after the aforementioned trade. Garoppolo guided San Francisco
to five wins as the team finished 6-10, two wins over eventual playoff teams Tennessee and
Jacksonville. The late season surge has 49er fans envisioning a playoff team as soon as the
2018 campaign.


The reaction from traditional media to social media has been all over the map. You are either
a 49er fan that feels like the franchise discovered bread now that their team has Garoppolo
or you think that’s too much money for a guy that has only started seven NFL games.


There is every reason to think the 49ers are a playoff contender. The have a dynamic
coach/general manager combination of Kyle Shanahan and John Lynch to go along with
the addition of Garoppolo. In the NFC West, Arizona is breaking in a new coach and
quarterback. Once dominant Seattle is at a crossroads. The Los Angeles Rams have a
dynamic quarterback/running back tandem in Jared Goff and todd Gurley along with a
brilliant head coach (Sean McVay). The time is right for San Francisco to become relevant
but pump the brakes -- or have another drink -- if you think this is a 12-4 team just yet.
Are the 49ers the team that started 0-9 or finished 6-1? The truth lies somewhere in the
middle.


There are plenty of examples of players signing a long term deal only to regress.
Garoppolo, however, is an intelligent player that has been well-schooled. I see that trend
continuing under Shanahan. The only worry is durability since he has yet to play a
16-game season but that’s the risk you take, especially in football.


If you think the franchise ponied up too much coin too soon, you are missing the point.
For openers, every year there are guys that have yet to play a single snap in the NFL that
sign multi-million dollar deals. Through Garoppolo has started just seven games, the point
is that he has been in the league for three years.


Garoppolo has been coached up by Bill Belichick and Patriots offensive coordinator Josh
McDaniels. It is also fair to say that Garoppolo has learned by observing the aforementioned
future Hall-of-Famer Brady. In his five starts as a 49er, he made a pedestrian group of
receivers, running backs and offensive linemen better. My goodness, Marquis Lee looked
like Jerry Rice once Garoppolo was in the starting lineup.


It is astounding how many casual fans show their lack of scruples when they link a player’s
salary with his resume, stats and where they rank among their peers. When a player signs a
record-setting contract, some fans have an orgasm with statements like, “He’s not worth
that money!” or “How can he be making that much money when this player over here has
better stats” or things to that effect. Basing a player’s salary on where he ranks among his
peers is flawed logic because careers have peaks and valleys. You just hope their
performance averages out relevant to their salary.


Take last season’s contract carasel between Carr and Stafford. After a promising first three
seasons, Carr and his Raider teammates took a nosedive on the way to a 6-10 season.
While injuries and former head coach Jack Del Rio’s roster and coaching staff
mismanagement played a role in the team’s downfall, Carr’s 2017 performance did not
measure up to his aforementioned new contract. If you are a Raider fan, the hope is that
the hiring of head coach Jon Gruden can get a broken down Carr back on the road -- pun
intended. On the flip side, Carr’s rookie contract of four years for $5.3 million measured
to his first three seasons would qualify as outperforming the contract. Keep in mind, in
2016 the Raiders went 12-4 with Carr being an NFL MVP candidate.


Stafford, thanks in part to a longer body of work, jumped Carr as the highest paid player.
Stafford just completed his ninth season. Before the 2017 season, most people had Carr
ranked in the 6-8 range among quarterbacks, Stafford was anywhere from 10-14. The
narrative was “Dammit how could Stafford be making more than Carr!” Based on 2017,
however, you can’t argue with Stafford being ranked ahead of Carr, thus making more
money. Just like last season, however, things could change.


Contracts are about timing, leverage and economics. If you think they are about resumes,
stats or ranking peers, you are naive by definition. Short of teams losing revenue, player
salaries are only going to skyrocket.

So the next record contract you see a player sign, understand two things: a) He is worth it
despite your belief to the contrary because b) His salary will be dwarfed within a year and
thus be a bargain.