Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Coming around to other ways of thinking on PE

There are times in life where you learn not to be so rigid in your beliefs.


By my own admission, I can be slow to change my mind because I have
a strong belief that my principles are on point. In general, I think most of
us feel that way.


Two weeks ago, I shared this story that appeared on my Facebook news feed:




The headline read that physical education should be required from kindergarten
through college. Without even thinking about it, I posted about how I could not
agree more because kids need balance in their lives perhaps more so than adults.


I received three responses from teachers/coaches that I hold in pretty high
esteem: Dylan Leach, Jill Stewart, Melissa Shimer and DeAnna Bowers. I
don’t consider their responses to be pushback simply because it got me
thinking about things that I never considered. Before I get into why I altered
my stance, let me give you context on how it got there:


Dylan Leach: PE is great for kids who do not participate in a school sport.
However, kids who participate in sports should not be required in my humble
opinion. I see the ignorance daily. Those kids should be with their coaches.
Especially the "9th grade PE situation." They are forced to do PE like pacers,
run miles and kickball, etc. Instead of training for athletics. Then, after school
they go to two hour practice where there coach is demanding 100% and they
are tired. Don’t get me started on PE teachers forcing the athletes to run a
timed graded mile on a game day. Pure ignorance. In addition. Those kids
(9th graders) also are not allowed to take weight training and lose out on a
year of learning techniques and accumulation of muscle. So once again, they
have the stress of finding time after school to lift. Those kids and their
coaches/strength coaches get no credit or stipend for the time they spend
giving back to the school.


Jill Stewart: Unfortunately, quality Physical Education is not a priority in
our district. We have excellent teachers and roll out the ball teachers. It’s
about professional integrity. Making Phys. Ed synonymous with athletics
is also ignorant. Even good coaches do not teach the FITT principle, energy
systems, rest and recover principals to take into adulthood. They are
concerned with training for athletic performance for their sport only. I totally
respect that. And all student athletes should have the opportunity to perform
at their highest potential. But kids should learn lifetime fitness and activity,
golf, tennis, learning how to pace on a run. Etc. I’m all for finding ways to
blend conditioning and Physical Education after HS students meet the state
mandated standards in Fit Gram after 9th grade. But, A very small percentage
of the high school kids will play sports in college.


Melissa Shimer: We need quality Physical Education that promotes lifetime
(lifelong) health and fitness. I have also made a huge focus on what the kids
are “learning” vs. what they are “doing.” It’s great to keep them active, but
also important that they feel that have learned quality things from my class.


I must confess that as a 46-year old man who is a father of three kids between
the ages of 10-12, I am one of these triggered old souls that is quick to get on
his soapbox and say things like: “Damn kids ain’t active enough!” “They
spend too much damn time on technology!” “Active kids get better grades!”
I have not necessarily wavered in those beliefs because I think sports mirrors
life. You have days of victory and defeat. For the former, you celebrate the
success but stay humble. For the latter, you pick yourself up and try to succeed
the next time.


I come from a generation that had Atari but we were still wired to be active
whether it was playing sports or riding our bikes like Bo Duke drove the
General Lee or simply playing outside. We also did all of these things and
took PE classes. We did it, why should today’s generation be any different?
So I thought. It makes sense in that just because things were done a certain
way in 1985, does not mean it should be done that way in 2019. Beliefs
evolve because we learn new information. Just because my generation rode
in the back of pickup trucks, did not wear seatbelts, rode as passengers on
bicycle handlebars, etc. does not make it a prudent choice today.


These responses, however, opened my eyes to think that perhaps kids that
already participate in a sport should not be required to overly exert
themselves. Asking a kid to run a timed mile on game day is purely asinine.
To Leach’s point, these same kids have coaches crawling up their tail to
give maximum effort. To Stewart’s point, high school is the pinnacle of
most people’s competitive athletic endeavors. To Shimer’s point, activity
should not be confused with production or learning.

So what are the solutions? I’m not privy to what life is like as a teacher.
Perhaps PE curriculum should be geared toward the lifetime fitness structure
like swimming or golfing, the two activities you can do at 65 or 25 because
they are low impact activities on your joints. However, if a youngster does
not participate in a sport, I couldn't agree more that PE should be a
requirement. For those who participate in a sport, perhaps their PE class
should be geared toward conditioning for their sport when they are out of
season.

So what exactly is the solution? I don’t know and I’ll leave that to those more
qualified than me but I’ve come around to other ways of thinking.

Saturday, June 8, 2019

Nonleague football outlook: St. Helena Saints

This is the fifth story in a series featuring nonleague schedules for
Napa Valley high school football teams. Today, the focus is the
St. Helena Saints:


The decade of the 2010s has been a fun time for St. Helena High football
fans.


Then the second half of 2016 and entire season of 2017 season happened.
After going 52-8 from 2011-2015, the Saints went 6-5 and 3-5 in each of
the following two seasons. The previous season, the Saints were 5-2 before
losing three of their last four. Last season, the Saints bounced back on some
level in going 7-5, beating Hoopa Valley 48-22 in the CIF North Coast
Section Div. V playoffs and along the way getting head coach Brandon
Farrell his 100th career victory.


Farrell enters his 12th season as the Saints head coach. There is a lot of
optimism entering this season and the next couple. Part of the shiny outlook
revolves around the backfield foursome of Luis Robledo, Ivan Robledo and
Cody DiTomaso at running back and Daniel Martinez at quarterback. Ivan
Robledo was called up from the JV team as a freshman and rushed for 439
yards on 48 carries and six touchdowns in two playoff games.


The other part of the optimism is rooted in the JV program going 18-2 the
previous two seasons under head coach Ian MacMillan, who was the Saints
varsity head coach from 2004-2006. MacMillan had multiple coaching stops
since that time before returning to St. Helena. While JV success comes with
no guarantees on the varsity level, in this case since Farrell’s program is a
proven commodity from the top on down, one would be inclined to think
that success is translatable.


In the North Central League I, Middletown has been the consistent contender
for multiple decades under Bill Foltmer with various other teams taking turns
challenging them. St. Helena has been that team throughout much of the 2010s.
The rest of the NCL I has become more competitively balanced as well. The
Saints figure to be one of the horses right in the midst of winning the race.


Before each high school football season, one of the most comical things to
listen to is fans, parents and even coaches talking about their team’s
strength of schedule or someone else’s lack of schedule strength.

Each time I hear such sentiments I ask myself, “OK, and what
exactly are you basing your statement on?” Is it last year’s record?
Is it based on how many starters a team has returning? Even though
an opponent is subpar now are you basing it on remembering them
as a powerhouse?


The formula used for breaking down the nonleague is looking at
last season’s record and the collective mark of the past five seasons.
In addition, what are that team’s trends within the five-year period?
Is that record skewed by one really good or bad season? The problem
with solely going by last season’s record is that one season does not
transfer to the next?


St. Helena has three nonleague games before embarking into NCL I
competition. The Saints nonleague foes went 20-14 in 2018 and have
compiled a 77-78 mark over the last five seasons. Here’s a closer look:


AUGUST 23


VS. ST. PATRICK’S (VALLEJO)


The Bruins have been very checkered the last five seasons in going
36-28. In a two-year stretch from 2016-2017, St. Pat’s went 24-5. In
2016, the Bruins went 13-3 and were crowned CIF State champions,
winning the 6-A Bowl Game. The 2018 version though was a distant
cousin of those aforementioned teams going 6-6. St. Helena and St.
Pat’s had numerous matchups as members of the disbanded Superior
California Athletic League from 1986-1999. The two teams met in
the 2014 NCS Div. V playoffs with St. Helena winning 3014.


AUGUST 30


VS. SIR FRANCIS DRAKE (SAN ANSELMO)


Though it is a nonleague contest against what has been a below-average
club, this game carries importance for the Saints because they are Div.
VII and Drake is Div. V. If St. Helena wins, that would bolster its
postseason resume. The Pirates compete in the Marin County Athletic
League and have struggled mightily the last five years in going 12-37,
eight of those wins came in two seasons, each being 4-6 campaigns in
2015 and 2018. The two teams have played in each of the last four years
with the Saints going 4-0, winning by an average score of 38.5-16.0.
That average is skewed by last year’s 26-23 win.


SEPTEMBER 6


AT WINTERS

The Warriors are a Div. IV team that competes in the Sacramento Valley
League out of the Northern Section. Winters has gone 39-19 the previous
five years, including 10-2 last season. The two school have met four times
in that five year span with the Saints going 3-1 with wins in 2014 (33-20),
2015 (15-14) and 2016 (32-24). Winters defeated the Saints 49-21 last
season. The two teams were slated to meet in 2017 but that contest was
cancelled because of the California Wildfires.

Sunday, June 2, 2019

Nonleague football outlook: Justin-Siena Braves

This is the third story in a series featuring nonleague schedules for
Napa Valley high school football teams. Today, the focus is the
Justin-Siena Braves:


As he enters his fourth season as head coach, the Justin-Siena High
football program has a full slate of players that have only known
Brandon Larocco as the head man. LaRocco, who was a long-time
assistant and former player of previous head coach Rich Cotruvo.
To refresh your memory, Cotruvo and the school parted ways after
19 seasons (1997-2015).


The Braves are coming off a season in which they vacated the Marin
County Athletic League after 18 years and joined the newly formed
Vine Valley Athletic League with fellow Napa County schools
Vintage, Napa and American Canyon along with Sonoma Valley,
Petaluma and Casa Grande from Sonoma County.


Justin went 5-7 overall and 1-6 in the VVAL. Three of those setbacks
were by a combined 10 points. The road gets no easier considering
that the Braves lost quarterback Barrett Donohoe, who masked a lot
of weaknesses, to graduation. VVAL champion Vintage appears to
have a strong structure from top-to-bottom. American Canyon and
Casa Grande are not going away. Also, Napa is not likely to go
winless as it did a year ago. Justin’s lone VVAL win came against
Napa, 36-32. The good news is that the nonleague schedule is
friendly. In which case the key is, make it rain for the nonleague
slate and get what you can in VVAL contests.


The Braves have gone 11-20 in LaRocco’s three seasons. Before
each high school football season, one of the most comical things to
listen to is fans, parents and even coaches talking about their team’s
strength of schedule or someone else’s lack of schedule strength.


Each time I hear such sentiments I ask myself, “OK, and what
exactly are you basing your statement on?” Is it last year’s record?
Is it based on how many starters a team has returning? Even though
an opponent is subpar now are you basing it on remembering them
as a powerhouse?


The formula used for breaking down the nonleague is looking at
last season’s record and the collective mark of the past five seasons.
In addition, what are that team’s trends within the five-year period?
Is that record skewed by one really good or bad season? The problem
with solely going by last season’s record is that one season does not
transfer to the next?

On the surface, a favorable nonleague slate awaits Justin. The Braves
opponents went 10-23 in 2018 and are a combined 80-125, the previous
five years. Here’s a closer look.


AUGUST 23


VS. PIEDMONT


The two schools have met seven times in the previous five years.
Piedmont has a 5-2 edge and has won all five regular season meetings.
Justin, however, has beaten the Highlanders in the two postseason
meetings, once in 2014 (14-3) and again in 2018 (53-28). Piedmont has
been checkered the last five years, going 12-1 and 9-3 in 2014 and 2015
respectively followed by a combined 20-16 the previous three years.


AUGUST 30


AT HEALDSBURG


The Greyhounds have a rich football history but 2018 is not one they
will want to save in the archives. After just two games, Healdsburg
football closed up shop on the 2018 campaign because of not having
enough players. The two games they played were a 41-0 loss to Sir
Francis Drake (San Anselmo) and a 61-0 loss to Justin. If you’re
scoring at home, that is two defeats by a combined score of 122-0
against teams that compiled a 9-13 record, not exactly Clemson or
Alabama. Healdsburg, which was a long-time member of the Sonoma
County League will compete in the Freelance League. Even before
last season, the Greyhounds were in a downward spiral, having gone
11-31 the last five years. Half of those wins came in a 5-6 season in
2016.


SEPTEMBER 6


AT ARMIJO (FAIRFIELD)


This matchup is compelling on one front in that Justin has some
student-athletes from Fairfield. Larocco himself grew up in Fairfield.
This will mark the second time in as many seasons that the two teams
have met. The Braves won last year’s contest 40-14. The Indians last
non-losing season was 2006 (5-5) and last winning season was 2005
(8-2). Armijo is 13-36 the last five years and went 4-6 last year.


SEPTEMBER 13


VS. ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN (SAN FRANCISCO)

The Crusaders have been no strangers to playing Napa teams in
nonleague because they played Napa High in 2017 (28-13 loss) and
2018 (40-31 win). The latter was Riordan’s lone win of the season.
Riordan has gone 15-38 the last five seasons with that record being
skewed by a 9-4 mark in 2015.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

High school lacrosse growth reaches Napa

The world of high school lacrosse is about to get bigger in Napa, CA.


After continuous discussions with the Napa Valley Unified School
District, the Board of Trustees approved to formally add the sport at
both Napa and Vintage High Schools. Justin-Siena has field the sport
since the 2010-2011 school year. The sport will offer both boys and
girls teams in the spring.


Lacrosse is the fastest growing sport in the United States as high school
student-athletes continue to show interest in participating. The next
hurdles to clear are financial and logistics.


Napa and Vintage moving to the CIF North Coast Section last year from
the Sac Joaquin Section facilitates the adding the sport because the NCS
has a far greater volume of schools with lacrosse than the SJS. Justin has
been in the NCS since the 2000-2001 school year. Quite simply, as
members of the SJS, Napa and Vintage would not have found enough
opponents.


The addition of lacrosse for Napa and Vintage also means the end of the
Napa Force, which is a Northern California Junior Lacrosse Association
team. The reason for the move is because the players on that team that do
not go to Justin, which is a private school of about 600 or so students, can
fill rosters on Napa and Vintage.


For those not familiar, lacrosse combines the skills of various sports in
that the scoring concept involves a net like hockey and soccer. It also
involves using a stick, similar to jockey. The sport also involves stopping
and starting on a dime like soccer and basketball and involves sprinting
like track. The sport is also physical like basketball, soccer and hockey.


The fact that NVUSD is adding this sport does not come as a surprise
because it has become exceedingly more popular locally as well as
nationally. Moreover, an increasing amount of families are leery of their
sons playing football and youths are not universally playing baseball as
past generations. The sport also features a higher volume of scoring than
soccer, hockey or baseball. You can argue whether that’s good, bad or
indifferent but it’s reality.


The only question becomes is the growth of this sport a trend or an
aberration? I lean towards the former. Despite the popularity surge, there
is still segments of people that consider lacrosse an obscure sport. Also,
because of the volume of equipment required to purchase in order to play
the sport, it becomes quite costly.


Between purchasing helmet, stick, elbow pads, and gloves, just to name
a few, suddenly you have a pretty costly sport compared to others that do
not require buying as much equipment.


I would venture to say the growth is closer to being a trend because over
70 NCAA schools field the sport and that’s just at the Div. I level. That
scenario will present yet another sport where a youngster can earn a
scholarship. Couple that with the fact that more high schools and youth
programs are adding the sport, that means the feeder system becomes
bigger.


It is also a sport that does not penalize a kid for his or her lack of size.
Though the sport has been popular for a long time in the Northeastern
states, the growth has especially become prominent in your West Coast
and Midwest states. Keep in mind, the University of Denver was the
first school to field lacrosse that was not in the Eastern time zone.


Even though the sport is not growing as rapidly on the professional
level as it is for youths, the Major League Lacrosse plans to expand to
16 teams within the next ten years. There are current six teams. With
the growth at the youth level, one would think the domino effect reaches
the professional ranks.


Therefore that popularity reaching these parts was only a matter of time.